Gita for Divinity

Some have thought that BUDDHI in the last verse refers to knowledge as contrasted with work, apparently on the ground that it is only for the Jnanin that leaving both the good and the bad is possible. But the

In any case it must be more than clear that “equanimity” is the only Yoga thought of in the Gita. We have shown in the preceding pages how all the four Yoga lead to this ideal Yoga and how as such they are not really so many distinct path, but are really inter-related. This explains why the Gita begins with Jnana and introduces Karma Yoga and finally concludes with Dhyana Yoga in one place, while it begins with Karma Yoga and treating of the other two Yogas concludes with the Jnana Yoga in another place. We may select here a passage in the last chapter of the Gita, where this inter-relation is more clearly suggested than elsewhere in the work.

 Here is indicated the relation between Karma Yoga and Jnana Yoga, how actlessness of the self is realised through unselfish work. Take these verses now. “Endowed with a pure mind, controlling the self with firmness, leaving aside objects like sound, giving up love and hatred, resorting to a sequestered spot, eating but little, speech and body and mind subdued, always engaged in meditation and concentration, taking refuge in dispassion, having abandoned egotism, strength, arrogance, desire, enmity, property, free from the notion of mind and peaceful, he becomes fit for becoming Brahman.” (XVIII- 51 -53).

  We are told in these s’lokas how Dhyana Yoga leads to Brahma Vidya or realisation of Brahman. Thus it is quite possible to conceive of how Karma Yoga necessarily involves Bhakti Yoga, Jnana Yoga and through Dhyana Yoga leads to realisation of the Brahman. And we might quote other similar passages to establish similar sequences of Yoga in a different order. This should be enough, therefore to show not only that the Gita does not consider the Yogas as mutually exclusive, but also that it implies the necessity of a certain order of discipline to be followed.. But still the fact remains, that according to the temperament of religious aspirant he would be called a Yogin in accordance with the method preferred by him.

            It is this peculiarity of the Gita that has baffled many a commentator, who started with a preconceived theory that the Gita wanted to establish a particular Yoga as supreme. As it is not the purpose of the present attempt to critically examine any of these theories, we may simply repeat here again the observation made in the introductory remarks that none of these exclusive theories can find any support in the Gita. According to the Gita, we may repeat, the ideal Yoga is equanimity and whatever leads up to that Yoga is itself a Yoga.

            It is now time to formulate an answer to the main question with which we started the present discussion. “What is the value of the Gita as a guide to practical life?” If by practically we mean a teaching to be reconciled to our present life which merely sanctions the way in which we live in the world, however gross may be its defects, then the Gita, to be plain, is absolutely of no value as a guide. For, the teachings are antagonistic to most of our conceptions of life. People of the ordinary frame of mind are, it is to be feared, mostly opposed in their trend of thought to the doctrines of the Gita. They believe in competition, in the theory that might is right, that the pleasurable is necessarily the eternal destiny of mankind and that one’s interest is identical with one’s duty. If this be the practical life, it may be confessed at once, the Gita is at best indifferent to it, but is certainly no guide to those that wish to lead such a life. But there is another kind of practical life. Instead of trying to reconcile the ideal with our present life, we might try to gradually improve ourselves till we approach the ideal. This ideal, however high it may be, must not be an impossible one. In this sense the ideal of the Gita is quite practical. Brahma- Vidya is its ideal, the realisation that Brahman or the Absolute is the self of us all. As observed elsewhere in the course of our discussion, everyone is consciously or unconsciously striving to attain the Highest Truth or Brahman. Owing to our not having an exact conception of what this ideal is are caused the different courses of action we take towards the realisation of it. Every man is therefore really following the path of Brahman, whatever course of conduct he may have chosen for himself and he is in the long run destined to take up deliberately the path of Brahman (IV- 11). Hence the realisation of Brahman becomes the ultimate goal of every one of us. Yoga or perfect equanimity is the one condition of actualising it. It goes without saying, therefore, that the teachings of the Gita offer the surest foundation for morality. While moral principles are only recommended in other sacred books without offering any philosophical basis for the same, the Gita is not only pre-eminently ethical in its nature, but supports it on the surest foundation of Brahma Vidya. We have had already occasion to note this in connection with Jnana Yoga . And it is this feature of the Vedatnta that has been specially appreciated by foreign admirers like Dr. Paul Deussen. This scholar says “ People have often reproached the Vedanta with being defective in moral and indeed the Indian genius is too contemplative to speak much of works, but the fact is, nevertheless, that the highest and purest morality is the immediate consequence of the Vedanta. The Gospel fix quite correctly as the highest law of morality : Love your neighbour as yourselves.” But why should I do so, since by the order of nature I feel pain and pleasure only in myself, not in my neighbour. The answer is not in the Bible (this venerable book being not yet quite free of Semitic realism) but it is in the Vedas, is in the great formula “तत्वमसि (Tat twam asi),” which gives in three words metaphysics and moral together.

 You shall love your neighbour, as yourselves because you are your neighbour and mere illusion makes you believe that your neighbour is something different from yourselves. Or in the words of the Bhagavadgita, he who knows himself in everything and everything in himself will not injure himself by himself “Na hinasti atmana atmanam.” This is the sum and tenour of all morality and this is the standpoint of a man knowing himself as Brahman”

            If we remember the circumstances that led to the teaching of the Gita, how Arjuna, a fighting king, was taught things by Sri Krishna also a Kshatriya, in a battlefield, and how Arjuna is exhorted at every stage not to neglect his duty and how at the same time the highest philosophical truths are taught him as the one penance for all evils of this world, we can measure he extent of practicality of the philosophy and religion of the Gita. According to the Gita there are not two worlds- one of practical life and another of religious life, but there is one undivided life, and the truths of philosophy and religion are to be felt and realized here or nowhere. Accordingly it says

 This verse occurring as it does after another which declares that “the wise see the same in a Brahmin endowed with wisdom and humility, in a cow, in an elephant, as also in a dog and in a dog-eating outcast.” Clearly points out the practical nature of the Yoga of equanimity. This Yoga of equanimity is not to be attained by taking refuge in a jungle from the vicissitudes of life and doing   nothing useful, it needs, no doubt, speaking from the standpoint of Dhyana Yoga, retirement into solitude not with an aimless discontentment, but with the express object of investigating the most important problems of life. Then again after the realization the ideal wise man is described throughout as in the above verses as spending his life in the very midst of the world. Whether they come in contact with the spirituality regenerated or with the worldly minded or even with the purely Tamasic souls who are not yet sufficiently developed to be fit for the busy concerns of life, they see in all the one and the same pure Brahman. Their very presence inspires other less- gifted souls, and their living personality is no small help to those that wish to keep up their balance of mind but are constantly tossed up and down by the waves of worldly life. Here is a very practical ideal, for every one of the thoughtful people on earth wants to get at a method whereby he can improve himself and be of some use to society. The Gita says to achieve this you must gain tranquility of mind, perfect balance of mind. Avoiding the extremes of inactivity अकर्म (Akarma) and activity with passion विकर्म (Vikarma), we should ever strive after intense activity, butin the midst of it, eternal calmness. This practice does not require any extra ordinary special qualifications reserved only for a few. For Sri Krishna says

 These are the only conditions. On must undergo training  of thought, word and deed. What this training is, is explained in the seventeenth chapter,

Practice of these constitutes Tapas. He must be devoted to God and willing to obey the injunctions. In a word, no special qualification is demanded except a sincere wish to improve oneself. Provided with this qualification one may practice the discipline from where he is placed by nature.

            Thus the Gita is one of the highest practical value to those who wish to get over difficulties in this life- difficulties which are the results of wickedness and evil,- and to those who wish to improve themselves as well as their environment. We might with perhaps even more propriety quote the very expressions which have been applied to European mysticism and say “its teachings hold just as good in the family, in the market, in the Senate, in the study, aye in the battlefield itself, and teach (man) the way to lead in whatever station of life he may be placed a truly man like because a truly God –like life.”